I copied the two hotcopy backups to the original repo locations, and
#Smartsvn checkout local repository download
There have been few updates since, so is the hotcopy of value or not,Īnyway, my thought was to save some upload and download time if possible. Basically the subversion repos on my remote server wereĬurrent as of about six months ago when they were established there Sorry, Nico, I probably didn’t use the correct terms in my problemĭescription. > I'm not objecting to your situation, just really confused by the svn content, 27 GB ? What in the devil are you > ? An import of the copy of the working data has no history. Since the only hotcopy, done shortly after the repo was loaded, there has been very little change, so if I could start with the hotcopy and somehow synch my working copy without pushing 27 Gb again, life would be better. > The original data, from just six months ago, was about 27 Gb, which took a very long time to upload from my home computer to my remote server. Your first answer didn’t help because I didn’t know the ramifications of what I was trying to do. > I don’t know, Nico, I am a real novice at this. > from a hotcopy to overlay the changes on top of that hotcopy? > the current working copy, without history, take more time than working > Under what possible conditions wound importing a single snapshot of
> the data are already there in the hotcopy. > working copy from scratch would take a LONG time, while the bulk of > Cycles aren't important, but the size of the data is.
> you spending any cycles on doing anything with hotcopy? You've lost > If you have working copies and you don't care about history, why are > Given that history will be lost, does anyone see any problems with my recovery plan? > On Mon, at 12:10 AM Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > On Mon, at 19:45 Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: On Mon, at 23:15 Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
0 kommentar(er)
